Tuesday, August 23, 2011

TED Three: The Wizard of Stats & Graphs

Apologies for not technically making this evening's deadline; hopefully you'll be able to catch up with me sometime tomorrow. If it's any excuse, I spent nine hours this afternoon and evening as an impromptu moving man, shifting a zillion storage boxes and fridges from a tent outside to an inside location. Though they survived the quake under the tent, we weren't so sure about the coming hurricane...

Anyway, here are tonight's talks, a double-header from Swedish uber-statistician Hans Rosling. He's funny, insightful and an absolute master of his signature digital presentations, as well as a couple of analog surprises he has in store for you here. Do watch both talks; they're both brilliant, and the second one is only about 10 minutes, so you're only really confronted with 1.5 times the normal amount of talking. As extra incentive, I'll keep my own commentary to an absolute minimum. Without further ado, be prepared to be amazed by Dr. Rosling! (Yes, I know the titles are a bit anachronistic; go ahead and watch the videos in the order in which they appear anyway.)

"New Insights on Poverty"


"Insights on Poverty"


Hopefully you found those talks as amazing and inspiring as I did. Again, I don't have much to add here. Despite the dazzling graphic displays, I think Dr. Rosling makes his own points with more than sufficient clarity. Just remember the past two days' lessons in Darwinism (it's good to be "nothing more, nothing less" than the anchor of the world socio-economic system, not the top dog) and changing your game. As I see it, there's an inherent no-growthism in what Rosling is proposing: we have to satisfy ourselves with being amongst those who are able to fly, not work on becoming those who can afford private space travel just to prove we're better than somebody. Also, if his charts didn't change your game somehow, I don't know what to tell you!

But finally, let's consider the nagging little Darwinian question that's just been thrown into the mix: why are we the only species that not only voluntarily limits its reproductive productivity and also seems to demonstrably benefit from doing so? If Darwinism is based on the ideas that the fittest survive by passing on their genes as much as possible and that the natural state of any living thing or species is evolution (hominids included), then why are humans reproducing less?

I'm not smart enough to answer that, but here's my guess: the evolution of humankind and the earth will be better served in the long term by humanity's intentionally leaving a smaller footprint on the planet. You've seen Dr. Rosling's statistics showing how positively smaller family size correlates with higher living standards, consider also its impacts on carbon and food consumption, etc. After all, most of us in the blue box already exceed our Kyoto allowances with our flying and driving. Imagine what will happen when the two green boxes get stacked on top of us... As the famous saying goes, if all insects on earth were to disappear, life as we know it would end within 50 years. But if all humans were to disappear, life on earth would flourish. Think about it...

No comments:

Post a Comment